UFC star Khalil Rountree Jr’s brutal knockout victory over Modestas Bukauskas has sparked a debate among the many trade’s fighters over whether or not the indirect kick ought to stay authorized.
The American MMA star beat light-heavyweight rival Bukauskas of their Saturday night time UFC Vegas 36 conflict, with Rountree performing the kick – often known as the knee stomper – to seal his second spherical victory within the octagon.
Lithuanian fighter Bukauskas fell to the ground in agony and is now going through a MRI scan to find out the extent of the knee harm that caused his defeat over the weekend.
Khalil Rountree Jr beat Modestas Bukauskas by way of an indirect kick at UFC Vegas 36 on Saturday
Bukauskas was severely damage by the ‘knee stomper’ transfer and is now going through a MRI scan
However a few of UFC’s greatest stars have now questioned whether or not the indirect kick ought to be authorized because it may doubtlessly finish many careers prematurely whether it is continued to be accepted within the sport.
UFC Middleweight star Kevin Gastelum tweeted: ‘This strike ought to be unlawful. It’s a profession ender. Who can we discuss to about this? @ufc
‘This in now method is a knock on Rountree. His efficiency and execution was nice to look at. However this strike ought to be addressed.’
Welterweight competitor Belal Muhammad added: ‘Ahhh that method ought to be banned that’s profession altering’
A number of UFC fighters raised questions over whether or not the indirect kick ought to be banned by UFC
American heavyweight star Jamahal Hill himself posted: ‘That’s precisely why that s*** shouldn’t be allowed!!! Hoe s***!!! #UFCVegas36’
One other light-weight star Vinc Pichel claimed: ‘I don’t care if I’m unpopular for this however that bulls*** kick ought to be banned.’
In the meantime, present UFC Bantamweight Champion Aljamain Sterling mentioned: ‘Who needs to enter a struggle, throw a jab, and get their whole knee destroyed… OUCH! OW! AHH! UGHH! That strike is a devastating one.’
The indirect kick is among the most controversial strikes in UFC. On one hand, the kick is a helpful tactic to take care of a powerful distance between one’s opponent, however it may trigger critical harm to fighters’ knee, as seen on Saturday night time.
The indirect kick helps hold a distance between your opponent and is a defensive transfer
Bukauskas now faces an unsure future in MMA with a MRI scan to find out his destiny
Each Rountree and Bukauskas have defended the previous’s use of the transfer over the weekend, regardless of the harm it prompted.
Rountree confirmed no regret in an Instagram publish on Sunday, the place he confirmed a compilation of him utilizing the kick with interview footage of him justifying his repeated use of the transfer.
The American mentioned within the video: ‘It’s an amazing method, it retains my opponent at bay. It’s an amazing possibility to maneuver, an amazing defensive transfer.’
Bukauskas additionally took to Twitter on Sunday defending Rountree over his in-fight actions, despite the fact that the Lithuanian faces a nervous wait over his UFC future.
Rountree (proper) confirmed no regret after the struggle, saying the transfer was a defensive motion
Each fighters and different UFC stars (above) defended Rountree’s actions within the octagon
A publish on his Instagram story learn: ‘Please give my opponent some slack, that kick was all good, it was my job to defend and I didn’t. Let the person take pleasure in his victory.’
Different UFC fighters backed the legality of the kick on social media over the weekend, despite the fact that they described it as ‘imply’ and ‘unhealthy kind’.
Talking concerning the kick, former UFC High Ten Featherweight Nik Lentz posted: ‘Dangerous kind. Def authorized, however unhealthy karma.’
In the meantime, former two-time Unified MMA Heavyweight Championship Tanner Boser tweeted: ‘Additionally, I do know I’m late right here however Khalil Rountree jr is a imply motherf*****. That was f***** superior. #UFCVegas36’